Short Hair Command
Jesus had short hair. He who made the soul created the body. That same love of detail and attention by God went into the making of both. To declare that God doesn’t care what you wear or look like is absurd, so much so that it borders on rebellion against the intricate design of the created universe. Consider this man buns, cropped or designed hairstyles.
Any fashion or trend that draws attention to oneself feeds into vanity, which is a sin. That’s why the Apostle Paul, inspired by the Holy Spirit, wrote in no uncertain terms
Does not the very nature of things teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him? 1 Corinthians 11.14.
True disciples of Jesus are called to align themselves with a good conscience, guided by the Holy Spirit. This includes recognizing that, by God’s design, short hair on men is part of his created order. Some might argue. But what about Samson or others in Scripture who had different hairstyles? To that, I’d ask do you have a specific anointing from God, like Samson, to deviate from the principles outlined in 1 Corinthians 11.14? To deviate from the principles outlined in 1 Corinthians 11.14?
The truth is, hairstyles like long hair, man buns or designer cuts often reveal a deeper issue. They suggest that the person at the center of that life is not Jesus but themselves. When churches tolerate or, even worse, celebrate these trends, they reflect a faith rooted more in cultural Christianity rather than in true obedience to the living God.
If we’re unwilling to follow clear, straightforward commands in Scripture, what else might we be ignoring? It’s often the seemingly small things, like honoring God’s design for hair, length in men, modesty in women, or even avoiding tattoos, that snowball into greater disobedience.
Over time, these small compromises can lead to the corruption of entire ministries, churches and individual walks with God. Look no further than modern church worship. Too often it is shifted from relevant praise to entertainment-driven performances. This decline is a striking example of how just a little yeast, just a small act of disobedience, can work through an entire batch of dough. Jesus himself said Whoever can be trusted with very little can also be trusted with much, and whoever is dishonest with very little will also be dishonest with much. Luke 16.10.
If we can’t be trusted with the little things in God’s Word, how can we hope to handle the deeper truths of Scripture? The time has come to stop being dishonest with God’s living Word. Let us repent of neglecting even the smallest of His commandments and pursue a life of complete obedience.
For more detailed analysis and spiritual references, visit wwwconsiderinfo.
Experts
He stands as one of the most recognizable figures in the Western world.
However, experts argue that the images you’ve come across depicting Jesus are largely inaccurate.
Jesus likely did not possess long, flowing hair and is also unlikely to have had a lengthy beard or worn elaborate robes.
Historians suggest that Jesus would have appeared similar to any ordinary member of first-century Judean society.
Yet, there is one surprising aspect of modern portrayals that aligns with historical understanding.
Despite the unusual notion that Jesus often appears with prominent abs, experts agree he would have been strong and lean.
Dr. Meredith Warren, a senior lecturer in Biblical and religious studies at Sheffield University, stated to MailOnline that such muscular representations aren’t entirely unfounded.
She noted, "Jesus came from a family where manual labor was common, and he certainly engaged in exercise through extensive walking."
In contrast to many modern interpretations, scholars believe Jesus would have had dark skin, brown eyes, and short, curly hair. His attire would consist of a simple knee-length tunic and a woollen mantle.
Hair and Beard
The common portrayal of Jesus often depicts him with brown, flowing hair and a full beard.
However, these representations fail to align with the historical evidence regarding Jesus.
One confirmed detail is that Jesus was ethnically Judean, hailing from a region corresponding to contemporary Palestine.
This indicates that his hair and beard would have been black and curly, not brown and straight.
It is also highly probable that Jesus maintained a short hairstyle and neatly groomed beard.
Similar to modern times, beard trends fluctuated in the Roman world over the years.
During Jesus’ era in the first century AD, being clean-shaven held significant importance to Romans, yet as a Jew, it is likely that Jesus sported a well-trimmed beard.
Paintings traditionally portray Jesus with pale skin, long hair, and a full beard. Nonetheless, experts contend these characteristics are inaccurate.
The True Appearance of Jesus
Hair and Beard
Jesus would have short, curly hair and a well-trimmed beard.
Facial Features
As an ethnically Judean individual, Jesus would have exhibited Middle Eastern traits, including dark skin and brown eyes.
Body Type
Due to manual labor and a frugal diet, Jesus would have been lean and wiry.
Clothing
He would have worn a knee-length tunic and an undyed woollen mantle adorned with tassels.
Roman coins from Jesus’ time depict Judean captives with short, curly beards, suggesting this was a common style of the era.
Joan Taylor, a professor of Christian origins at King’s College London, shared with MailOnline, "Long hair and a long beard indicated something significant in ancient Judaism—namely, adherence to a special vow and abstaining from wine."
"As someone who was often accused of drinking too much, Jesus was likely not following such a vow."
Interestingly, some of the earliest representations of Jesus depict him as well-groomed.
Artworks dating back to the early third century AD found in the church at the ancient site of Dura-Europos in Syria portray Jesus clean-shaven and with hair cropped well above the collar.
Yet, similar to numerous modern images, these features reflect the cultural context of the time rather than the historical figure itself.
In the first century AD, Professor Taylor notes, long hair on men was seen as "rather unseemly."
However, by the fourth century AD, artists began portraying Jesus with longer hair and beards based on the themes they wanted to convey.
The earliest image from the Dura-Europos church shows Jesus with short hair and no beard; long hair was specifically worn by Jewish men who took vows of abstaining from wine.
This third-century illustration showcases Moses parting the Red Sea, and experts believe this short hair and beard style is the most accurate representation of how Jesus likely styled himself.
Dr. Warren adds, "If artists aimed to connect Jesus with concepts like the Good Shepherd or align him with Roman deities such as Dionysus or Apollo, they would depict him with longer hair; conversely, for portraying Jesus as a philosopher, a longer beard would be used."Later, as we contemplate the concept of an omnipotent Christ as Creator, his portrayal resembles that of Zeus or Jupiter—characterized by a beard and longer hair.
Facial Features
Interestingly, the Bible provides very few descriptions of Jesus’ physical appearance.
However, based on the limited biographical details available, experts have been able to infer some aspects of his likely facial features.
Dr. Warren states, "Jesus would have had brown skin and brown eyes, similar to the local population. He died before reaching the age of 40. Not being wealthy and spending much time outdoors, he likely had some wrinkles. His hands and feet were probably calloused and rough."
To gain further insight, experts examine other individuals who lived in the region during that time.
Starting in the fourth century, Byzantine representations of Jesus began to depict him with pale skin and Western features.
In reality, experts argue that Jesus would have resembled the men in first-century Egyptian mummy paintings. These artworks depict dark-skinned men with brown eyes and curly hair.
One notable detail the Bible conveys about Jesus’ appearance is his ordinariness.
When soldiers arrived to seize him in the Garden of Gethsemane, they required Judas to identify him amidst a throng of other Judean men.
Similarly, in the Gospel of John, Mary Magdalene mistakes him for a gardener when searching for his body.
From this information, some scholars suggest that Jesus likely looked quite similar to other men of his era and did not possess many distinctive traits.
Dr. Warren believes that the best representations of Jesus’ potential appearance come from the Egyptian mummy portraits, created of men who lived between 80 and 120 AD in a similar geographical location.
These paintings portray men with dark eyes, brown skin, short curly hair, beards, and facial features typical of individuals from modern-day Egypt, Palestine, and Israel.
In 2015, medical artist Richard Neave utilized forensic techniques to reconstruct the face of a Judean man by examining Semitic skulls.
Richard Neave’s reconstruction illustrates what a man from that region may have looked like. Without other distinctive characteristics, Jesus could have resembled this portrayal.
The reconstruction revealed a broad face, dark eyes, a bushy beard, and short curly hair, along with a tanned complexion likely representative of Jews from the Galilee area.
While this is simply a portrait of an adult man from the same period as Jesus, it offers a clearer idea of the features he may have possessed.
Muscles
In numerous statues and paintings, one of the oddly consistent features is that Christ is often depicted with chiselled abs.
While this detail may seem overblown, experts argue that it isn’t entirely unfounded, considering the details of Jesus’ life.
Professor Taylor points out, "Jesus walked extensively during his mission, and as a carpenter or builder, he was far from sedentary. He and his disciples mainly relied on hospitality and charity for sustenance, which likely meant he didn’t eat a great deal. I envision him as more wiry than bulky."
This suggests that depictions of Jesus with a six-pack might not be as unrealistic as one might assume.
Jesus is frequently portrayed with pronounced muscles and defined abs. While experts agree that he probably wouldn’t have been excessively muscular, his manual labor and modest diet would have contributed to a wiry strength.
However, representations of Jesus on the cross with exaggerated biceps and chest muscles significantly misrepresent his appearance.
Given that he traveled on foot and consumed little, it would be quite surprising if Jesus were particularly muscular.
Clothing
Today, when we encounter paintings of Jesus, he is often depicted wearing a long white robe reaching his ankles.
However, in first-century Judea, such long robes would have been associated with women’s attire.
Instead, men in that region typically wore a short woolen tunic made up of two pieces, belted or tied at the waist, with a lighter linen tunic underneath.Only Roman citizens were allowed to wear togas; however, Jesus likely wore a thick woolen mantle known as a himation to keep warm. As a Jewish man, his mantle might have featured knotted tassels called tzitzit at each corner.
Jesus would have donned a knee-length tunic that was belted at the waist, layered under a woolen cloak called a himation (illustrated).
The sandals unearthed in caves near the Dead Sea, dating back to the first century, resemble the simple footwear Jesus would have worn.
It’s worth noting that many garments from this period also featured fringes, so this was not an uncommon style.
One accuracy in modern portrayals of Jesus is that individuals in Judea at the time would have worn leather sandals. Archaeologists have discovered examples of first-century sandals in the Dead Sea and Masada caves.
These findings suggest that Jesus’ sandals would have been quite basic, constructed with thick leather soles stitched together, and the straps would pass between the toes.
Regarding color, while images often depict Jesus in a red or blue mantle over white robes, archaeological evidence indicates that people wore brightly patterned clothing during that era. Nonetheless, it is more plausible that Jesus’ garments were of more muted hues.
"While many garments were dyed vibrant colors, wearing duller shades or undyed fabric was deemed more masculine," explains Professor Taylor.
"Appearance and clothing are significant. Jesus explicitly instructed those he sent to wear only one tunic and one pair of sandals, without any money, mirroring how refugees might arrive in a village with nothing. He himself would have dressed very simply."
WHY IS JESUS DEPICTED IN DIFFERENT WAYS?
The Bible offers no physical description of Jesus.
In Western art, he is often portrayed as Caucasian, but depictions also represent him as Latino or Aboriginal. This may help people from various cultural backgrounds relate more easily to the biblical figure.
Early representations illustrated him as a typical Roman man, with short hair and no beard, wearing a tunic. It is believed that the bearded depictions of Jesus did not appear until around 400 AD.
This change likely aimed to portray him as a wise teacher, as philosophers of the era were typically shown with facial hair. The well-known image of a fully bearded Jesus with long hair became established in Eastern Christianity by the sixth century, and later in the West.
Medieval European art often depicted him with brown hair and light skin, an image further solidified during the Italian Renaissance by famous works like Leonardo da Vinci’s The Last Supper.
Contemporary portrayals of Jesus in films usually maintain the long-haired, bearded stereotype, while some abstract representations depict him as a spirit or light.
Source Material
Revealed: What Jesus REALLY looked like, according to experts
He is one of the most instantly recognisable figures in the Western world. But experts say that every image you’ve seen of Jesus is almost certainly inaccurate.
Cultural Christianity
Cultural Christianity is a belief in Jesus arising from Bible reading, preaching, commentaries and inherited religious culture. It is the opposite of the whole gospel, which involves a complete surrender of all, picking up a cross and following the Holy Spirit where one does not want to go, do or believe. In short, the offense of the cross is not present in the belief or faith of such individuals.
Post Number
This Post's ID Number Is= 10095
- Remember the Post ID Number.
- Enter the post number and it will be find.