The latest episode critically examines the flawed nature of jury verdicts and the systemic issues surrounding jury selection. By exploring historical and contemporary examples, we reveal how biases and the lack of calls for reform contribute to a compromised judicial process.
• The examination of jury roles and public perception
• Discussion on the manipulation of jury selection by prosecutors
• Historical examples of wrongful convictions and their impact
• The absence of serious calls for jury reform in the legal system
• The importance of informed jurors for fair outcomes
The following is a reading of the post entitled but a Jury Found them Guilty. This reading has been edited for this format and may differ slightly from the actual post. The post’s ID number is 9967 and can be found at wwwconsiderinfo. But a jury found them guilty. Non-thinking individuals often declare but a jury found them guilty. Non-thinking individuals often declare Well then, with that simple logic, nazi juries that sentenced Jews were correct and the Jim Crow-era lynchings in the Deep South were carried out under the guise of justice. Consider Seattle, washington. When Christianity is in the crosshairs, there’s little doubt about what the outcome will be Jury selection joke.
Washington state prosecutors once told a jury pool that jury selection is a dog and pony show. This is why you never, ever hear a whisper from prosecutors calling for jury reform. Prosecutors never cry out for stricter laws to obtain top-tier jurors. Informed jurors would create stronger, more critical thinkers, and that is precisely the kind of jury prosecutors don’t want. Prosecutors around the country have thousands of tricks up their sleeve, backed by black-robed judges, to create the best fools for the state. So you never, ever hear a whimper about jury reform. The informed juror threatens the prosecution’s power, which is why the police, prosecutors and judges typically oppose such reforms. Whether prosecutors, police or judges need a not-guilty verdict for a cop on trial or a guilty verdict for someone they’ve targeted, jury selection remains an absolute joke. This is why God instructs us never to follow the crowd. Do not follow the crowd in doing wrong. When you give testimony in a lawsuit, do not pervert justice by siding with the crowd. Exodus 23, 2. Prosecutors and Jury.
One of the most extensive legal farces within the court system is a jury’s verdict of guilty or not guilty. Why? Because juries are only as sound as the society and community. They’re drawn from Stupid in, stupid out, and prosecutors and judges know this. They actively seek out stupid in to guarantee stupid out. But a jury found them guilty is just a lazy statement used to avoid critical thinking. Consider this In Nazi Germany, courts often found Jews guilty. In the post-Civil War, jim Crow, deep South minorities were often found guilty. Does that make the verdict correct? In Seattle Washington, a jury found a Christian church and one of its members guilty when their beliefs caught the attention of hostile prosecutors. And now you know why. King County prosecutors call jury selection a dog and pony show. Do not be shocked when you hear of the jury verdicts that acquit guilty cops or crush innocent individuals. The jury pool is a children’s waiting pool to the legal system. For more discussions about juries and justice, tune in to the Consider podcast examining today’s wisdom, folly and madness. Visit us at wwwconsiderinfo.
Basic Info
Judge Beth M. Andrus’s favoritism towards Prosecutor Rich Anderson came with a wink after reprimanding him for his inappropriate, prejudicial and offensive remarks. She whitewashed the criminal actions of City of Enumclaw Detective Grant McCall, which contributed to a narrative aimed at undermining the church and its operations within Enumclaw. Eventually, destroying a business, church and bookstore while driving the church out of town. Though Ms. Andrus was a pastor’s daughter, she systematically proved that she is not a Christian believer.
Judge Lori K. Smith collaborated with King County Prosecutors to obstruct the defendant’s right to mount a defense. She transformed the criminal court proceedings into a chaotic "family court" environment that enabled deceitful accusations to make a mockery of justice. Judge Lori K. Smith so bribed by being named "woman of the year," perverted justice to ensure a guilty verdict against a man.
Prosecutor Dan Satterberg specifically allocated five prosecutors to target the church. Prosecutor Leesa Manion received backing from Satterberg and takes sinful pride in being the first Korean woman to hold a position in the prosecutor’s office. Ms. Manion actively supports the corrupt practices established by Satterberg to the extent of rehiring Prosecutor Rich Anderson.
The prosecutorial team included Prosecutor Mark Larson, Prosecutor Lisa Johnson, Prosecutor Nicole Weston, Prosecutor Rich Anderson and Prosecutor Jason Simmons.
In the case of King County Superior Court, State of Washington, Plaintiff vs. Malcolm Fraser, Defendant, Case No. 12-1-01886-0 Knt, it is essential to clarify that the true plaintiff is the King County Superior Court, State of Washington, against Sound Doctrine Church of Enumclaw, Washington. Washington State Prosecutors have engaged in abusive legal tactics to pursue an impossible crime aimed at eliminating Timothy Williams or Sound Doctrine Church from Enumclaw. The defendant, Malcolm Fraser, has been misused by King County Prosecutors and Enumclaw Police to effectively proxy-prosecute Timothy Williams.
Disclaimer & Information
Post Number
This Post's ID Number Is= 13214
- Remember the Post ID Number.
- Enter the post number and it will be find.