Trump Guilty?

Table of Contents

This Post’s ID Number Is= 6927

Fraud In The Law
Donald Trump found guilty? Whatever one’s politics, “the law” is corrupted. There is so much overwhelming fraud in the law, that no one can honestly claim any longer that it is “the law.” The sins of Seattle’s King County Prosecutors and courts have consumed the United States body of laws.

Corruption Only Grows

It is not good to be partial to the wicked or to deprive the innocent of justice. (Proverbs 18:5)

Seattle’s King County Courts onward, there is fraud in the law and they helped set into motion the virus of corruption roughly 10 years ago.

Remember well when showing up for jury duty, do not loose your soul by giving way to corruption of "the law."3

Washington State, Seattle King County Prosecutors boast that jury duty is their, and I quote, " dog and pony show." Correction: Date is 2016.

Judge Lori K. Smith and Judge Beth M. Andrus of Washington State we must give both honors where corrupt credit is due.

Both judges and prosecutors bastardized the law to the point that reality was bent and twisted while whitewashing City of Enumclaw Police corruptions.2

The real cult of prosecutors and judges across the United States are fully engaged in complete twisting of "the law."

Donald Trump found guilty? Whatever one’s politics, "the law" is corrupted. The "law and order" folks ignored justice and corrupted what is lawful. Now the liberals are further degree-grading the crumbled foundation of "the law."

Now it is just awful law, not "the law."

Wa. Prosecutors Script Accusations

Enumclaw Police got away with it years ago as Judge M. Andrus whitewashed Detective Grant McCall’s illegal activities of a hate crime. Literally, the Enumclaw Police were enabled to sit alone with a false accuser and script out accusations.1

Thus, laying the corruption for Judge Lori K. Smith to pervert a criminal trial into a political and religious witch-hunt. Not just devoid of evidence, but all the evidence exposed a hate crime by Enumclaw Detective Grant McCall and his co-conspirator.



The Consider Podcast attempts to express opinions through God’s holiness. Nothing concerning justice or injustice should be taken as legal advice or a call to action. There is no political agenda. There is no individual moral life advice. Indeed, each person is solely responsible before God and man for their actions or inactions. The Consider Podcast is narrowly focused on one thing, and only one thing – the need for all to surrender to a life of repentance according to the whole gospel.

The Consider Podcast
Examining today’s wisdom, folly and madness with the whole gospel.

Generated Information

The following will be bias – for information purposes only.

Is Donald Trump Found Guilty? Breaking Down the Verdict
In a political climate rife with anticipation and controversy, the question "Is Donald Trump found guilty?" has captivated a global audience, underscoring the gravity of accountability in political leadership. The implications of this inquiry stretch far beyond the courtroom, touching on themes of justice, public trust, and the resilience of democratic institutions. At the center of this legal and moral quandary are the allegations involving Stormy Daniels, which have added layers of complexity and public interest to the case, demonstrating how personal actions can echo profoundly in public life.
This article will delve into the verdict and its immediate ramifications, offering a comprehensive analysis of the charges, the trial details, and the broader political landscape. As readers navigate through the sections, they will gain insight into the political and public reactions that have shape-shifted around the outcome of this high-profile case. Understanding how this verdict fits into the current political zeitgeist and what it could potentially spell out for future engaging in political offices will be paramount for readers seeking clarity and deeper analysis on one of the most talked-about legal sagas of recent times.
The Verdict and Its Immediate Ramifications
Summary of the Guilty Verdict on All Counts
In a historic decision, Donald Trump was found guilty on all 34 charges of falsifying business records, related to a scheme aimed at influencing the 2016 election through hush money payments. The courtroom atmosphere was tense as the verdicts were announced, culminating in a unanimous decision by the jury after more than nine hours of deliberation. This verdict marks a significant legal milestone as it is rare for such high-level political figures to face such serious charges and be found guilty on all accounts.
The Significance of Being the First Former President Convicted
Donald Trump has become the first former U.S. President to be convicted of felony crimes. This unprecedented verdict sets a profound precedent in American legal history, highlighting that no individual, not even a former president, is above the law. Legal experts and historians note the significance of this moment, emphasizing its potential implications on the perception of accountability in political offices.
Trump’s Stoic Reaction and Immediate Statement
Throughout the reading of the verdict, Trump maintained a stoic demeanor, showing no physical reaction to the successive declarations of "guilty." Following the court session, Trump’s response was measured. He expressed his discontent with the outcome, hinting at political retribution and framing himself as a victim of a biased legal process. His statement, "The real verdict will be in the upcoming elections," suggests an appeal to his supporters and an indication of his continued influence in political circles despite the legal convictions.
The Charges and the Trial Details
Overview of the Hush Money Case and Charges
Donald Trump faced 34 state counts of falsifying business records in the first degree, a felony under New York law. The charges stemmed from allegations that Trump, along with his former lawyer Michael Cohen and National Enquirer publisher David Pecker, conspired to suppress stories potentially damaging to Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. Specifically, the charges related to a $130,000 payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels, intended to prevent her from publicizing an alleged affair with Trump. This payment, along with other similar transactions, was purportedly disguised as legal fees in the business records.
Key Evidence Presented by the Prosecution
The prosecution’s case centered around a detailed paper trail comprising 34 documents, which included 11 invoices, 12 vouchers, and 11 checks. These documents were critical in establishing that the payments to Cohen were not for legal services as recorded, but reimbursements for the hush money paid to Daniels. Notably, nine of these checks bore Trump’s distinctive signature, underscoring his direct involvement in the transactions. Former Trump Organization controller Jeffrey McConney testified about the handwritten notes detailing the repayment plan to Cohen, further corroborating the prosecution’s claims of intentional misclassification.
Defense Arguments and Counterpoints
The defense argued that the transactions were typical of political campaigns that often seek to influence media narratives and that non-disclosure agreements, like the one with Daniels, are common. They contended that Cohen, as Trump’s personal attorney, was indeed being compensated for legitimate legal work, despite the lack of a formal retainer agreement. The defense highlighted Cohen’s lack of credibility, given his history of lying and his own legal troubles, suggesting that the payments were unrelated to the election. However, this narrative was challenged by the prosecution’s presentation of extensive documentary evidence and witness testimonies that linked the payments directly to an effort to influence the election outcome.
Political and Public Reactions
Reactions from Political Figures and the Biden Campaign
The aftermath of Donald Trump’s conviction has sparked a spectrum of reactions from political figures across the United States. Notable Republicans, including House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senators like Lindsey Graham and John Cornyn, have expressed strong disapproval of the verdict, labeling the trial as politically motivated and an abuse of the justice system. On the other side, Democrats have upheld the verdict, with figures such as Representative Adam Schiff and Senator Chris Murphy emphasizing the trial’s integrity and the importance of upholding the rule of law. President Joe Biden, while not directly commenting on the specifics of the case, remarked via social media about the importance of the electoral process in deciding political leadership, subtly hinting at the ongoing legal battles not influencing Trump’s political future.
Public and Media Responses to the Verdict
The public response has been equally polarized. Supporters of Donald Trump gathered outside the courthouse, echoing his claims of a rigged trial, while his detractors celebrated the verdict as a victory for legal accountability. Media coverage has varied, with conservative outlets focusing on perceived injustices in the trial process and liberal outlets highlighting the historic nature of a former president being convicted of felony charges. This division is reflective of the broader national split over Trump’s political legacy and the implications of his legal challenges.
Trump’s Claims of a Rigged Trial and Appeals for Support
Donald Trump has been vocal in his criticism of the trial, asserting that it was rigged and politically motivated. He has pointed to the judge’s previous political donations and the political affiliations of jury members as evidence of bias. Following the verdict, Trump has actively sought to rally his base, framing the legal outcomes as an attack on his political career and by extension, his supporters. This narrative has resonated with many of his followers who continue to see him as a viable political figure despite the legal controversies surrounding him.
The Broader Political Landscape
Implications for Trump’s Future Political Ambitions
Donald Trump’s conviction has undeniably cast a shadow over his future political ambitions. Despite the legal hurdles, he remains a central figure in American politics, particularly within the Republican Party. As Trump faces the possibility of incarceration, his ability to campaign might be contingent on the decisions of Judge Merchan regarding the timing and conditions of any potential sentence. Even if incarceration is delayed to allow for an appeal, the label of "convicted felon" might alter public perception and influence his political viability.
Potential Impact on the Republican Party and the 2024 Election
The Republican Party finds itself at a crossroads following Trump’s conviction. Historically, the party has shown robust support for Trump, which does not seem to wane significantly even with his legal entanglements. However, the conviction introduces a complex dynamic into the 2024 Presidential Election. It provides the Biden campaign with potent ammunition to challenge Trump’s fitness for office, potentially swaying undecided voters. On the other hand, Trump’s unwavering base might be galvanized by what they perceive as political persecution, possibly increasing voter turnout and financial contributions in his favor.

Post Number

This Post's ID Number Is= 6927

  1. Remember the Post ID Number.
  2. Enter the post number and it will be find.

See Post ID System For List Of Posts

1 City of Enumclaw Washington, Detective Grant McCall
2 Judge Beth M. Andrus, King County Judge Marlin J. Appelwick, King County Judge Ronald E. Cox, King County Preacher Timothy Williams,, Seattle, City of Enumclaw, Washington, King County, Sound Doctrine Church, Sound Doctrine Christian Church, the Salt Shaker, Winepress Publishing, Redemption Press, Governor Jay Inslee, Enumclaw Hate Crime, Judge Susan Craighead, King County, Prosecutor Dan Satterberg, Prosecutor David Seaver, Prosecutor Jason Simmons, Prosecutor Lisa Johnson, Prosecutor Mark Larson, Prosecutor Nicole Weston, Prosecutor Rich Anderson, Seattle, Washington State, Timothy Williams, Sound Doctrine Cult, Sound Doctrine Church, Washington State Bar Association,, Office and Conference Center Location Washington State Bar Association 1325 Fourth Ave., Suite 600 Seattle, Wa 98101-2539 , Preacher Timothy Williams, Paul G. Sewell Attorney Prosecutor, Dog and Pony Show, Washington State Judge Lori K. Smith, King County Prosecutors, Enumclaw City Council, Anthony Wright Beau Chevassus, Chance La Fleur, Commander Tim Floyd, Enumclaw Attorney Mike Reynolds, Hoke Overland, Kael Johnson, Kyle Jacobson, Tony Binion, King County Committee, King County Judge Marlin J. Appelwick, King County Judge Ronald E. Cox, King County Judge Stephen J. Dwyer, Full Circle Athena Dean Holtz Redemption, King County Superior Court, State of Washington, Plaintiff, V. Malcolm Fraser, Defendant Cause No. 12-1-01886-0 Knt, Court of Appeals State of Washington, Respondent, V. Malcolm Fraser, Appellant, No. 70702-7-1, Ian Goodhew King County Prosecutor Washington State, Justice Stephen J. Dwyer Enumclaw Police Department 1705 Wells St. Enumclaw, Wa 98022 City Enumclaw Attorney Mike Reynolds, City of Enumclaw Washington, Seattle, King County, Chief of Police City of Enumclaw Washington, Seattle, King County Floyd, Tim Commander City of Enumclaw Washington, Seattle, King County, Berean Baptist Church 9702 128th St. E Puyallup, Wa 98373 Po Box 73042 Puyallup, Wa 98373 Phone: 253-841-4100 E-mail: [email protected] Fentanyl Attorney General Bob Ferguson Washington State sane border crusher, grandma destroyer, free speech oppressor, user of the poor has done. Prosecuting Attorney Office: Miss Leesa Manion brags, boasts and marches in pride that she is a woman holding power. No man can expect a fair judgment as she adds to the corruption of Dan Satterberg and Enumclaw Detective Grant McCall in leaps and bounds. With a nonsense boast about being a woman so too just as Satan fell from heaven because he was full of pride about himself he then became the father of lies. See John 8:44
3 With many other words he warned them; and he pleaded with them, "Save yourselves from this corrupt generation. (Acts 2:40)