Follow The Finger Police Setup
A white paper recap report.
The following is strictly text, while the post with graphics, other points and illustrations can be found by clicking here.
Enumclaw Police Detective Grant McCall and his Co-conspirator framed up a false crime with the full approval of King County Prosecutors of Seattle, Washington. Combing favoritism towards police and the anti-Christian radicalization of Washington State, it was a perfect storm for legal abuse.
Note that not a single person, group or official within or helping with the situation ever objected to Detective Grant McCall sitting alone, deleting evidence or Judge Lori K Smith literally stating the Washington State Constitution on religious freedoms does not apply. And that is just to name a couple of voilations of reality, truth and justice that are documented.
Consider a policeman who plants drugs in order to frame an individual. This is the same concept except on a grander scale.
You might ask why prosecutors, Police and Judges refuse, block, and play stone-deaf toward every call for an investigation. Indeed, Enumclaw Detective Grant McCall did not examine the house where the alleged actions were to have occurred because it would have stopped the hate crime dead in its tracks. The reason for this is that it would have proven the crime to be literally impossible and exposed the setup that was in progress at the time.
The Setting
Seattle Washington State
King County Court
City of Enumclaw
In the case of King County Superior Court, State of Washington, Plaintiff vs. Malcolm Fraser, Defendant, Case No. 12-1-01886-0 Knt, it is essential to clarify that the true plaintiff in the King County Superior Court, State of Washington, was against Sound Doctrine Church of Enumclaw, Washington.
Washington State Prosecutors have engaged in abusive legal tactics to pursue an impossible crime aimed at eliminating Timothy Williams or Sound Doctrine Church from Enumclaw because of Washington State’s opposition to Christians. The defendant, Malcolm Fraser, was the pawn used by King County Prosecutors and Enumclaw Police to proxy-prosecute Timothy Williams.
Far more evidence, including videos of the trial and clarity of events, can be found at www.consider.info
At the time, Enumclaw Detective Grant McCall was a radical Baptist, believing that only one version of the Bible is God’s Word. Namely the 1611 version of the King James Bible with its arick thees and thous. Combined with self-righteousness that borders on pathological and the abuse of police powers, this matter comes easily into focus.
Manipulated Testimony Corrupt Prosecution
In a shocking case of judicial corruption and criminal actions involving false sexual assault accusations, Enumclaw Detective Grant McCall manipulated a key witness into giving false testimony. This fabricated statement was then reinforced by King County Prosecutor Jason Simmons, who knowingly presented the lie as fact to secure a conviction despite clear contradictions in the accuser’s initial statements. Instead of serving as an impartial arbiter, the legal system became a tool for enforcing a predetermined narrative that fit the prosecution’s agenda. The reader will benefit from noting how anti-Christian Washington State has demonstrated itself to be.
Court records indicate that the accuser initially insisted no penetration had taken place. When Enumclaw Detective Grant McCall questioned her about whether the defendant’s finger had entered her vagina, she repeatedly denied any form of penetration. Her statement was unequivocal: "Never ‘like penetrated me or anything.’"
To escalate the charges to a felony, Detective McCall needed an allegation of penetration. When he couldn’t establish vaginal penetration, he shifted his focus to anal penetration. Introducing the idea himself, he asked, “What about your anus?”
The accuser hesitated, stumbling over her words. Sensing this, Detective McCall immediately called for a break, shutting off the recorder at a crucial moment. This interruption conveniently provided an opportunity to reshape the narrative. Alone with her during this break, he coached her, shaping her account to align with his desired allegations. When the session resumed, her testimony had changed, aligning perfectly with the detective’s narrative.
When the recorder was switched back on, McCall simply said, “Okay.” Immediately after, the accuser began narrating a fabricated account of the events, now claiming, “Yeah, he did, but it only happened for a few minutes because I screamed really loud.”
This sudden shift in testimony—influenced by strategic coaching, which the court chose to ignore—raises profound concerns about the integrity of the investigation.
A direct transcript reveals how this false narrative was constructed:
Detective Grant McCall
“And you’re sure that his fingers didn’t penetrate your vagina?”
Accuser
“Yes.”
Detective Grant McCall
“What about your anus? It’s okay if you want to take a little break?”
Accuser
(Unintelligible)
____Break¬-__
Detective Grant McCall
“Okay.”
Manipulated Accuser
“Yeah, he did, but it only happened for a few minutes because I screamed really loud.”
There is much more, but all reasonable individuals at this point can easily grasp what is taking place. This is why King County Prosecutors and Judges blocked any investigation into the hate crime.
Prosecutor Jason Simmons then took this fabricated testimony and presented it as an irrefutable fact before the jury. Simmons tactics included portraying inconsistencies as evidence of trauma rather than contradictions, reinforcing the falsehood.
In his closing statements, Simmons falsely asserted that the accuser had always maintained that penetration occurred. He deliberately misrepresented earlier statements to fit the constructed narrative, ensuring the jury perceived the altered testimony as a long-standing truth rather than a recent fabrication. Combined with strong enflaming of hatred towards Sound Doctrine Church, Police corruption and the actual crime were not even in focus.
This deliberate reinforcement of the lie was not an oversight but a calculated legal maneuver. Multiple prosecutors, including Mark Larson, Lisa Johnson, Nicole Weston, and Rich Anderson, maintained direct and continuous contact with the accuser’s family and extended family, ensuring that the false narrative remained reinforced and unchallenged. This was a concerted effort to create and sustain a falsehood that would secure a conviction.
Judicial Protection of the False Narrative
Judge Lori K. Smith played a crucial role in ensuring that the defense was systematically stripped of its ability to challenge the manipulated testimony. She obstructed the defense’s ability to introduce evidence that countered the prosecution’s claims, effectively protecting Prosecutor Simmons and his team’s constructed narrative. The jury was thus presented with a one-sided account devoid of reality, with all truthful and relevant evidence suppressed by Judge Lori K Smith.
The Larger Agenda
This case was not simply about an individual defendant—it was a proxy attack on the Sound Doctrine Church and its leadership, particularly Timothy Williams. Detective Grant McCall and his co-conspirators sought to dismantle the church through legal means, and the prosecution was complicit in this effort. The fabricated allegations were part of a broader campaign with a predetermined goal: to destroy the church and its influence.
Prosecutor Dan Satterberg’s decision to assign five prosecutors to a single case highlights an unprecedented level of bias. Under his direction, these prosecutors devoted significant resources to targeting the church—not in pursuit of justice, but to dismantle its operations.
The consequences were devastating: the destruction of a business, church, and bookstore, ultimately forcing the church out of town. Prosecutors Dan Satterberg and Leesa Manion spearheaded this unethical campaign, demonstrating a deliberate intent to dismantle the church rather than uphold the law.
The Consequences of Judicial Corruption
This case is not just about one false conviction—it represents a broader pattern of legal corruption in King County. The prosecutorial team, consisting of Jason Simmons, Mark Larson, Lisa Johnson, Nicole Weston, and Rich Anderson, operated with impunity. They ensured that this fabricated narrative was not only accepted but also aggressively defended in court.
Judge Lori K. Smith’s actions demonstrate a concerning willingness to suppress defense arguments, reject exculpatory evidence, and foster an environment where deceit flourishes. When the defense attempted to challenge the contradictions in the accuser’s testimony, Judge Smith dismissed their arguments, ensuring that the prosecution’s case remained intact.
If you are facing accusations of a sexual offense in King County, be aware that the judicial system has demonstrated a pattern of manipulating testimonies, implanting false memories, and enabling corrupt police practices. The reach of this corruption extends far beyond the courtroom. Prosecutor Dan Satterberg, along with Prosecutor Leesa Manion, have compromised multiple facets of the legal system, from medical institutions such as Harborview Medical Center to social services, kids’ court, and various non-profit organizations. These entities work in tandem to fabricate charges that will lead to a guilty verdict, regardless of the evidence. Their actions reflect a strong, if not aggressive, disregard for factual integrity and the rule of law.
A Justice System in Crisis
This case exemplifies a profound failure of the justice system. The Enumclaw Police, King County Prosecutors, and the judicial authorities collaborated to fabricate a case that lacked any factual basis. The Washington State Supreme Court, despite being presented with clear evidence of misconduct, refused to even review the case. Their response was not one of impartial judgment but an outright refusal to engage with the facts.
If this level of corruption can exist within the King County judicial system, it raises serious concerns about the integrity of prosecutions across Washington State. This is not a singular miscarriage of justice but an indication of a systemic issue where truth is secondary to predetermined outcomes.
Conclusion and Call for Justice
The prosecution of Malcolm Fraser, Defendant, Case No. 12-1-01886-0 KNT, was never about justice—it was about executing a premeditated attack on a religious community through legal manipulation.
Enumclaw Detective Grant McCall scripted false accusations, Prosecutor Jason Simmons cemented those lies in court, and Judge Lori K. Smith ensured that no counterarguments could disrupt the narrative. Together, they orchestrated a legal tragedy that not only destroyed an individual but also set a dangerous precedent for the abuse of judicial power.
The implications of this case extend far beyond the individuals involved. It serves as a stark warning of what can happen when law enforcement, prosecutors, and judges collude to create a conviction rather than seek the truth. Anyone facing accusations in King County must be aware that they are up against a system willing to manipulate facts, suppress evidence, and disregard the fundamental principles of justice.
Perverts of Jurisprudence
We know that the law is good if one uses it properly. We also know that law is made not for the righteous but for lawbreakers and perverts, for liars and perjurers–and for whatever else is contrary to the sound doctrine. 1 Timothy 1:8-10
Judge Beth M. Andrus‘s favoritism towards Prosecutor Rich Anderson came with a wink after reprimanding him for his inappropriate, prejudicial and offensive remarks. She whitewashed the criminal actions of the City of Enumclaw Detective Grant McCall, which contributed to a narrative aimed at undermining the church and its operations within Enumclaw. Eventually, it destroyed a business, church and bookstore while driving the church out of town. Though Ms. Andrus was a pastor’s daughter, she systematically proved that she is not a Christian believer.
Judge Lori K. Smith collaborated with King County Prosecutors to obstruct the defendant’s right to mount a defense. She transformed the criminal court proceedings into a chaotic “family court” environment that enabled deceitful accusations to make a mockery of justice. Judge Lori K. Smith, so bribed by being named “woman of the year,” perverted justice to ensure a guilty verdict against a man.
Prosecutor Dan Satterberg specifically allocated five prosecutors to target the church. Prosecutor Leesa Manion received backing from Satterberg and takes sinful pride in being the first Korean woman to hold a position in the prosecutor’s office. Ms. Manion actively supports the corrupt practices established by Satterberg to the extent of rehiring Prosecutor Rich Anderson.
Detective Grant McCall of the City of Enumclaw was involved in orchestrating a false hate crime. He deleted evidence and crafted accusations while refusing to investigate the claims, aware that examining the facts would reveal the deceit. King County Prosecutors obstructed and suppressed any attempts to initiate an investigation.
The Prosecutorial Team included Prosecutor Mark Larson, Prosecutor Lisa Johnson, Prosecutor Nicole Weston, Prosecutor Rich Anderson and Prosecutor Jason Simmons.
The Washington State Supreme Court, when presented with the evidence and facts, responded that they would not even consider it. That they would not “even look at it.”
Current Washington State Supreme Court Right Rape Are
Steven C. González: Chief Justice, elected as Chief Justice on November 5, 2020, and sworn in on January 11, 2021.
Debra L. Stephens: Associate Justice, previously served as Chief Justice. Charles W. Johnson: Associate Justice, re-elected in 2014. Susan Owens: Associate Justice, re-elected in 2012. Douglas W. McQuaid: Associate Justice, elected in 2012. Richard Sanders, Associate Justice, ran in 2012 but did not win. Bruce O. Danielson: Associate Justice, elected in 2012.Bruce Hilyer: Ran for a position in 2012 but did not win. John Ladenburg: Ran for a position in 2012 but did not win. Sheryl McCloud: Won a position in 2012.
Eddie Yoon: Ran against Charles W. Johnson in 2014 but did not win.
Note: Remember that this court is so actively biased against Christians that they went after a Christian grandmother for not arranging flowers for a gay wedding. The above police abuse also took place at the height of the Me Too movement. Which as a side note, is exactly what started the events after the Manipulated Accuser was primed and groomed to do.
The Consider Podcast
Examining Today’s Wisdom, Folly and Madness
www.consider.info
Quick List
The following list may be updated.
Post Number
This Post's ID Number Is= 16039
- Remember the Post ID Number.
- Enter the post number and it will be find.