Four Types of Jurors
Jury duty, four types of jurors. “Therefore, the law is paralyzed and justice never prevails. The wicked hem in the righteous so that justice is perverted.” (Habakkuk 1:4). The window of time for judges, prosecutors and police to repent is fast coming to a close.
“Christian”, police, lawyers, and prosecutors had best repented their unholy silence towards the corruptions and impurities among-st their fellow workers. In the past, God overlooked such ignorance, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent. (Acts 17:30). 1
1: Worldly Wise Juror
The worldly-wise juror are the most qualified, talented, smart, bright, correct decision makers a country has and thus refuse to show up for jury duty. These worldly-wise jurors when showing up for jury duty have serious questions for the prosecution, police, and to judge during jury’s election. They are quickly dismissed. (Jeremiah 35:6). But they replied, “We do not drink wine, because our forefather Jehonadab, son of Rekab, give us this command.: ‘Neither you nor your descendants must ever drink wine.’”
2: Naive Juror
The naive juror still believes the legal system is fundamentally decent, doing some good and shows-up for jury duty. The naive juror are re-soundly rejected by the prosecution, the judge and the government because they are highly likely to employ honest common-sense and decent logic towards The Law, life and facts. The naive juror is not easily manipulated, and the legal system seeks to discourage their involvement with many a goad. (Matthew 15:14). Leave them, their blind guides. If the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit.
3: The Injudicious Juror
The injudicious juror lacks the ability to render good judgments and supports the police, prosecutor and the judge of “the law” by default. They always show up for jury duty and are eager to be admired by the judge, prosecution, and police. The injudicious juror is the all-time favorite of the state, for such individuals look respectable but are fools to their own egos. They speak the same lie-language of the court system and are swayed by emotions rather than facts. Such are easily manipulated, often compromising the mob-radical elements of society. The injudicious juror is thoroughly deceived by tabloid prosecutions. (Proverbs 26:12), “Do you see a person wise in their own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for them.”
4: The Fool Juror
The strongest goal of the prosecution, judges and police is to place as many fool jurors in the jury box. The fool juror is eager to be manipulated, to set-aside any conscience for the privilege of expressing a fool’s opinion. Concepts such jury nullification, facts and reality are beyond their grasp.
The fool juror may come to a correct conclusion, but usually for the wrong reasons. How long will you who are simple love your simple ways? How long will mockers delight in mockery and fools hate knowledge? (Proverbs 1:22). Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. (Proverbs 1:82). 2
The consider Podcast. Today’s events, Paulorrow’s realities. www.consider.info. “Follow justice and justice alone.” Deuteronomy 16:20.
Graphic
Podcast
Disclaimer
The Consider Podcast attempts to express opinions through God’s holiness. Nothing concerning justice or injustice should be taken as legal advice or a call to action. There is no political agenda. There is no individual moral life advice. Indeed, each person is solely responsible before God and man for their actions or inactions. The Consider Podcast is narrowly focused on one thing, and only one thing – the need for all to surrender to a life of repentance according to the whole gospel.
The Consider Podcast
Examining today’s wisdom, folly and madness with the whole gospel.
www.consider.info
Post Number
This Post's ID Number Is= 2699
- Remember the Post ID Number.
- Enter the post number and it will be find.
See Post ID System For List Of Posts
- Reject Trump Idolatry - 07/24/2024
- Bad Actors List - 07/11/2024
- Malcolm Fraser’s Pardon - 07/10/2024
0 comments on “Four Types of Jurors”